« Free Software Foundation's First European Licensing & Legal Workshop | Main | INTA, Berlin May 17 - 21 2008 »

16 April 2008

Two stripes and you're out

417932_adidas_shoesTrade mark lawyers will be interested in a recent ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the case of Adidas v Marca Moda, C&A Nederland, H&M & others.

The ruling arises from a reference to the ECJ from the Dutch Supreme Court, in a case to do with Adidas' well known three stripes, which it uses on almost all of its sports gear. Adidas has various trade mark registrations for the three stripes.

The ruling is heavily technical, and readers can find a detailed report by Jeremy Philips on Class 46. Here's a quick summary of the key facts and bits of the ruling...

A number of retailers in the Netherlands, including H&M and C&A, had started retailing clothes that featured similar stripes (e.g. H&M sold sports gear with two stripes). Adidas sued these retailers for trade mark infringement. The retailers sought to rely on a number of provisions of the Trade Mark Directive to argue that Adidas' trade marks were either invalid or did not prevent the usage on clothes by others of types of stripes except for three stripes (i.e. two stripes good, three stripes bad!) The ECJ ruled that, because the Adidas three stripes were so distinctive, Adidas could rely on its trade marks to bring infringement actions against others who featured stripes on their clothes.

The above summary deliberately over-simplifies things, so once you've taken in the key facts, head to Class 46's report for the fine detail.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c948553ef00e551edd5bd8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Two stripes and you're out:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

About IMPACT

Contact IMPACT

  • Feel free to email the IMPACT team with any suggestions for new content, or if you'd like us to assist you with any legal issues.

Search


  • search the web
    search IMPACT

The legal bit

  • The news and articles on IMPACT are not legal advice and you shouldn't rely on them as if they were. Please don't act on any of the information on this blog without getting professional advice on the subject. Like most free general information blogs, we don't accept any liability in connection with your use of the information on the site.

    If you do need specific legal advice, the team behind IMPACT would be delighted to help.

    Creative Commons License

    We post the information on this blog under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 2.0 Licence (English law). You provide any comments and materials that you make on the same Creative Commons licence terms.

    Find out why we use a Creative Commons licence.

    We've registered our brands as trade marks. The following links will take you to the registrations for IMPACT, Freeth Cartwright and FC.

Accessibility

  • We take accessibility very seriously. We want everyone to be able to access the stuff we've put on the blog. If you've got any comments or suggestions for how to make the blog more accessible, please email the team.

    To learn more about accessibility and why it's important see our article Making websites open to all. There are more accessibility posts in the Accessibility section of IMPACT.