« Banking Code: user liability for losses from online banking | Main | NODUS - 7 May 2008 »

08 April 2008

6 months is enough, Article 29 Working Group tells search engines

The Article 29 Working Group of EC data protection commissioners has given an Opinion on the handling of personal data by search engines. The headline grabber so far has been the statement that search engines should retain personal data about users for no more than 6 months.

The Opinion follows the Working Group's requests to Google and other search engines last year for information about their data retention policies. According to a BBC News report:

"The report issued a set of obligations to search engines firms, including:

  • Search engines should get informed consent from users if they correlate personal data across different services, such as desktop search
  • Search engine providers must delete or anonymise (in an irreversible and efficient way) personal data once they are no longer necessary for the purpose for which they were collected
  • Personal data should not be held by search engines for longer than six months
  • In case search engine providers retain personal data longer than six months, they must demonstrate comprehensively that it is strictly necessary for the service
  • It is not necessary to collect additional personal data from individual users in order to be able to perform the service of delivering search results and advertisements
  • If search engine providers use cookies, their lifetime should be no longer than demonstrably necessary
  • Search engine providers must give users clear and intelligible information about their identity and location and about the data they intend to collect store or transmit, as well as the purpose for which they are collected"

The dominant search engine Google, retains user personal data for 18 to 24 months, anonymising it after 18 months. Perhaps unsurprisingly, it has already criticised the Working Group's opinion on its Public Policy Blog.

The Article 29 Working Group's views on data retention periods at the search engines are also unsurprising, given the concerns it voiced last year about current periods being too long - see our August 2007 analysis of Google's data protection policies against the Working Group's comments.

Next steps

It's going to be interesting seeing how the Working Group and the various data protection authorities of individual EU jurisdictions take this forward. Google and the other search engines are highly unlikely to accept without a fight any request from data protection authorities to reduce their data retention periods. The Opinion's other "obligations" may receive a warmer reception.

The Working Group's Opinion certainly isn't the end of its battle with the search engines over their use of personal data. Expect more developments in the next year.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c948553ef00e551cae9728834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 6 months is enough, Article 29 Working Group tells search engines:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

About IMPACT

Contact IMPACT

  • Feel free to email the IMPACT team with any suggestions for new content, or if you'd like us to assist you with any legal issues.

Search


  • search the web
    search IMPACT

The legal bit

  • The news and articles on IMPACT are not legal advice and you shouldn't rely on them as if they were. Please don't act on any of the information on this blog without getting professional advice on the subject. Like most free general information blogs, we don't accept any liability in connection with your use of the information on the site.

    If you do need specific legal advice, the team behind IMPACT would be delighted to help.

    Creative Commons License

    We post the information on this blog under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 2.0 Licence (English law). You provide any comments and materials that you make on the same Creative Commons licence terms.

    Find out why we use a Creative Commons licence.

    We've registered our brands as trade marks. The following links will take you to the registrations for IMPACT, Freeth Cartwright and FC.

Accessibility

  • We take accessibility very seriously. We want everyone to be able to access the stuff we've put on the blog. If you've got any comments or suggestions for how to make the blog more accessible, please email the team.

    To learn more about accessibility and why it's important see our article Making websites open to all. There are more accessibility posts in the Accessibility section of IMPACT.