I have posted previously about the implications of the Fraud Act 2006 for the world of intellecual property. I picked up an interesting story about it's application in this field on Technollama which echoes the thoughts I have expressed.
« Great patents: a spacer | Main | We should all love the FOI »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c948553ef00d8357d037069e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fraud Act 206 Developments:
The comments to this entry are closed.
The news and articles on IMPACT are not legal advice and you shouldn't rely on them as if they were. Please don't act on any of the information on this blog without getting professional advice on the subject. Like most free general information blogs, we don't accept any liability in connection with your use of the information on the site.
If you do need specific legal advice, the team behind IMPACT would be delighted to help.
We post the information on this blog under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 2.0 Licence (English law). You provide any comments and materials that you make on the same Creative Commons licence terms.
Find out why we use a Creative Commons licence.
We've registered our brands as trade marks. The following links will take you to the registrations for IMPACT, Freeth Cartwright and FC.
To learn more about accessibility and why it's important see our article Making websites open to all. There are more accessibility posts in the Accessibility section of IMPACT.
Comments